Friday, 26 February 2021
What to do now the 21st century is not even a teenager any more
Being the last video it should probably include a short summary of the main points, but it probably just ends rather abruptly, with more questions asked than answers, and many things left unsaid. A bit like this post.
Tuesday, 23 February 2021
Humidity and Traditional Buildings
Keeping walls airtight is still very important, but we also need to understand how moisture moves through materials, and how important that is if moisture does get into your building materials, which is an undesirable, but unfortunately not unavoidable situation.
Tuesday, 10 November 2020
Air and Water: Condensation and Humidity
Whenever I talk about humidity I have a strong sense that I don't really know what I'm talking about. I think this is normal, because humidity is not at all intuitive. I know that my glasses will steam up when I come into a warm room from the cold. But what goes on within walls and buildings is complicated and strange. When predicting which way the moisture will go, I end up just assuming it will go where we don't want it!
In today's video I attempt to explain. In doing so I realised I need to say a lot more about diffusion, and probably do a whole new lesson on summer humidity. I can also talk about traditional approaches to protect buildings against condensation.
Also I suggested that high humidity could increase the risk of spreading viruses. In fact low humidity can increase the risk of spreading viruses.
Friday, 15 September 2017
Too Much Humidity
It may be global warming, acceptance of reality or weakness to luxury, but I think we need take active measures to remain comfortable in the peak summer heat. I need to take a closer look at passive house and high-temperature high-humidity in a different post.The temperature is not a huge problem. It rarely goes over 28 degrees, and when it's 35 degrees outside, 28 degrees is a relatively pleasant temperature. The problem is when it is humid, and when it gets over 70% humidity it starts to feel really hot.
A de-humidfier would make the house more comfortable without making it cooler. In terms of thermal efficiency, de-humidification is a good idea since heat gain depends on temperature difference, so taking moisture out of the air makes it feel cooler without encouraging more heat to come in. On the other hand, making the house cooler means a bigger temperature difference, and more heat leaking in from outside.
Actually, we do have an air conditioner in one room, and that air conditioner does have a dehumidifier. But the de-humidify function just seems to work by cooling the air, and that room was not designed for the air to circulate through the rest of the house, so it just gets very cold in there when the dehumidifier is on.
Most dehumidifiers work by running air over a cooling element so that humidity condenses out of it. They differ depending on what happens to the heat that was taken away to cool the air. Either the heat can be put back into the air, or it can be taken out of the building. Our air conditioner does the latter, sending out cold, dry air. If you have a dehumidifer for a basement that gets damp in the winter, you want the former.
So do we want a dehumidifer that transfers the heat out of the house, or one that keeps it inside?
Should we try to dehumidify the air as it comes in through the ventilation system or should we get a standalone dehumdifier?
Would it just be cheaper and easier to get an air conditioner that can de-humidify?
Even if it was more expensive, would we be better off getting an air conditioner that can also cool and heat and do other fancy stuff? Maybe we could even get one that humidifies as well, since we need more moisture in the air in the winter.
Can I fit another air conditioner unit to the compressor that spends over 360 days of the year idle on my roof?
Or will it be cheaper to get another air conditioner with its own compressor?
How much moisture are we talking about?
The last question is easy.
If it's hot and humid outside, the ventilation system is going to be adding saturated air to the house. If it's 28 degrees, 60% humidity inside, with the ventilation system working at 150 cubic metres per hour, that is going to add 1.6 litres per hour. This is how much the dehumidifier needs to remove at peak load.
One very simple solution would be to switch off the ventilation system, or at least turn down the flow. This is a short term measure, because we do need fresh air in the house, but at night time and in the morning we open the windows and get plenty of fresh air in anyway. In fact the main demand for ventilation is to remove the moisture that we produce when we breath, wash and cook. If there are just a couple of people and a cat in the house, then we should be OK for a few hours. Turning down the ventilation would also be a good solution on cold winter nights when there is a risk of freezing in the drain from the ventilator.
References
Formulae for calculating absolute humidity from relative humidity and temperature
Workings:
Our house breathing in humid air:28 degree air at 100% humidity holds 27 grammes water per cubic metre.
Assume 60% humidity inside. That means an extra 11 g/m3.
Air flow of 150 cubic metres per hour.
That's 1.6 kg of water per hour to get rid of.
Humans breathing out humid air:
In one hour we breathe in about 450 litres of air.
Assuming exhaled air is 100% humid at 36 degrees C; inhaled air is 60% at 28 degrees C.
1 cubic metre of exhaled air holds 42g of water vapour.
1 cubic metre of inhaled air holds 16g of water vapour.
We each contribute about 12 grammes of water per hour. Is that all?
Tuesday, 23 February 2016
Dripping Diary
![]() |
| left: drain from ventilation system |
Tuesday, 17 November 2015
Lesson 6: A lesson in humidity
Once again I got about half way through my lesson plan by the time the bell went. This time it was a good thing as I reached a fairly neat cut-off point.
The title of the lesson was Air and Water, and after explaining humidity, I had planned to go on to talk about ventilation, but that will wait for another day. I hope nobody is holding their breath!
I started by asking why my glasses steam up when I come in from the cold, why mirrors mist up when you breathe on them, and what this has got to do with low energy buildings. The answer of course is humidity.
I next asked them to estimate how much air was in the room, and how much water was in the room. Their estimates for the amount of air in the room ranged from 150 to 600 cubic metres. I had a tape measure which allowed a more precise calculation, of around 190. Their estimates of the amount of water in the room were just as varied, although one group was also taking into account the human beings in the room, who are 70% water. I managed to steer us onto the water in the air, or more precisely water vapour.
Next I asked what you would do with water if you wanted to dissolve a lot of sugar in it. One of the students had brought to class a thermos flask with sugar water, which provided a nice link to this question.
In just the same was as you heat up water to dissolve more sugar in it, heating up air allows it to hold more water vapour. In fact the amount of water it holds doubles every ten degrees or so. Very roughly a kilogram of air at freezing will hold almost 4 grammes of water. At 10 degrees it will hold almost 8 grammes. At 20 degrees 15 grammes and at 30 degrees 28 grammes.
The trickier part to understand is relative humidity. This is the amount of water in the air as a percentage of the maximum moisture the air can hold. So for a given body of air, as the temperature goes up, the relative humidity will go down. As the temperature goes down, the relative humidity will go up.
I tried to explain this by talking about the class, which had a total of nine students, of whom three were Japanese. So the class was around 30% Japanese. If three of the non-Japanese people left the class, there would still be three Japanese, but they would now be 50% of the class.Back to the moisture in the air, if the temperature continued to go down, at some point it would become saturated and the water would start precipitating or condensing. That's called the dew point.
Next we considered what would happen if air were able to pass through insulation. In winter it's going to be something like 20 degrees inside and freezing outside. As the air passes through the insulation and the temperature drops, it's going to hit dew point and you'll get condensation forming in the wall.
This left me with my top two suggestions if you want condensation in your house: make it airtight with no insulation, or make it well insulated but not airtight. The moral of the story, in fact the moral of the course so far, a little insulation is a dangerous thing.
===
Temperature and humidity chart from sustainabilityworkshop.autodesk.com
Saturday, 24 May 2014
Humidity makes it hotter ... or colder
Finally I've realised the cause of this anomaly.
There are actually two effects of higher humidity on the body losing heat. One reduces the ability of the air to remove heat from the body, and the other increases it.
As we know, the body mainly loses heat through evaporation of the body's perspiration. The ability of this perspiration to evaporate is hindered by high humidity. Humid air just has less carrying capacity for those water droplets and will push up
The other effect is on the air's heat capacity. Water is a very effective carrier of heat, with a kilogramme of the stuff able to hold almost twice as much heat as a kilogramme of air. Adding water to air is going to increase this heat capacity. More heat capacity means a greater ability to take away heat.
Perhaps as it gets hotter, and the difference between body temperature and ambient temperature becomes smaller, the evaporation effect is larger, so humid air makes us feel hotter. Meanwhile, when it gets colder and the difference in temperature is larger, the higher heat capacity effect is larger.
Perhaps, but probably not.
Water certainly does have twice the heat capacity of air, but absolute humidity is measured in grammes of water moisture per kilogramme of air, so the increased heat capacity may only be one percent, comparing dry air with dripping wet air at 10 degrees centigrade. It's difficult to imagine this making the kind of two or three degree differences that humidity makes when it's hot.
Clothes are another matter though. The amount of water they can hold does not depend on temperature and absolute humidity, but on relative humidity and the related vapour pressure. Cotton can hold up to 15% of its weight in water, wool can hold up to 35%. Both of these textiles are hydrophilic and will try to reach an equilibrium with the atmosphere around them steadily releasing or absorbing moisture. That all takes energy, and any water content in the clothes needs to be kept warm.
At last this seems to make sense, although I'm not completely sure it's correct. I know the hiker's adage that cotton kills, but also I've heard that if you are stuck somewhere cold and damp, the best thing you can do is wrap yourself in a woollen blanket, since wool is exothermic.
Notes and references
This article is only tangentially relevant, but has a good explanation of hydrophilic textiles seeking equilibrium with their environment: Iqbal, M., Sohail, M., Ahmed, A., Ahmed, K., Moiz, A. and Ahmed, K. (2012) Textile environmental conditioning: Effect of relative humidity variation on the tensile properties of different fabrics Journal of Analytical Sciences, Methods and Instrumentation 2(2), 92-97In fact there is much older work on moisture in textiles, for example, Albert C. Walker's Moisture in Textiles (1937, in Bell system technical journal, 16, pp 228-246). This goes into some detail on exactly where the moisture goes within cotton hairs.
And here is some propaganda from New Zealand wool industry: New Zealand Merino Company Limited (no date) Heat and moisture regulation.
You may want to compare this with the moisture content of wood. In textiles terms, of course, wood is just raw rayon.
A Q and A session on physics.stackexchange.com was helpful in debunking my first hypothesis, giving the formula cs = 1.005 + 1.82H, where 1.005 kJ/kg°C is the heat capacity of dry air, 1.82 kJ/kg°C the heat capacity of water vapour, and H the specific humidity in kg water vapour per kg dry air in the mixture.
Saturday, 19 April 2014
Water is not going to collect in the summer... or is it?
But then I realised that actually it is going to be a problem, because water is going to be accumulating there, and while it might be fine in a steady state if you add some water to hot air, this is not a steady state. Humid air is constantly coming in, and water is going to be added to that chamber and will not be able to leave, so sooner or later it is going to push the humidity up and over 100% and water will start dripping.
References
(TD is the dew point, f is the relative humidity, T is the temperature.)
Friday, 28 February 2014
Humidity and temperature
For a range of temperatures and relative humidities, at five-degree and ten-percent intervals, It shows the absolute humidity and dew point. The absolute humidity is grammes of water per cubic metre of air. The dew point is the temperature the air must drop to if water is going to start precipitating from it, or the temperature the air must not drop to if you don't want condensation.
The issue of humidity and temperature is in fact very complex, since you're looking at the properties of droplets of water that are behaving like a gas. More information in general is available here on wikipedia.
If you do know that, then there are plenty of forums out there, and a great deal of physics. In the meantime, I'll stick to relative humidity doubling with every ten degree temperature drop, or use the table if I need more precision.
Sunday, 23 February 2014
DIY ventilation maintenance
I just learnt that word from the Stiebel manual, which I've been reading to find how to clean the heat exchanger. The manual says in one place that it must be cleaned every three years, but elsewhere that it should be cleaned every year. The suppliers of leaky ventilation systems mentioned a three-year maintenance, and wanted us to sign a contract with them, which we did not. The system has been leaking for about the third time, and two weeks ago they came to fix it, which they did not.
I'd left a bowl under the system where it had been catching drips. I knew there would probably be a bit more water to drip through as everything dried out. I didn't expect it to be overflowing two weeks later, and still coming out after I'd emptied the bowl. I called the builders once again to tell them that the problem hadn't been solved. It was still leaking, a little less than before so it wasn't urgent for somebody to come, and since it was a snowy Friday, the following week would be fine. I got a call back to say he was in the area anyway and would be there at 6pm. He also said that the ventilation experts had asked me to contact them directly, which I'd evidently forgotten, misheard or ignored. Then a few minutes later another call came to say they'd be charging us. I asked why they'd be charging us this time, when they were just finishing the job that they hadn't done properly last time. Then I told them there would be no need to come, and I'd be in touch if necessary.
The first thing I noticed as I was following the instructions to get the heat exchanger out was that he'd put the filter back in the wrong way round. This is probably not a big deal if it's a clean, new filter, but it had been filtering a few weeks of crap from the air coming in, and since he put it back the wrong way round, that crap was all going to go straight into the innards of the machine, which the filter was supposed to protect against. My confidence is not inspired if he didn't know which way the air was flowing, or couldn't read the arrow on the filter, pointing in the direction of airflow.
Maybe I'm being hypercritical. I shouldn't be so harsh on these people who are innocently going about their business of importing European technology to Japan without properly understanding how it works.
Removing the bypass unit from the ventilation system revealed a large pool of water in the bottom, with a drain in the middle that was not letting anything through. A screw driver helped unblock this.
Once it was draining through the drain, it became apparent that the system was not level. The housing of the ventilation and heat exchange is all expanded polystyrene. Underneath the diamond-shaped heat exchanger unit there is a small reservoir with a drain in the middle. If I'd been designing it, I would have made it slope towards one corner and put the drain there. A few millimetres of water were still settling towards the front, so it wasn't very effectively draining. You can see the effect this has had of leaving a dirty residue. I remembered their boss saying that it was a good idea to drain the bath every night since the Japanese custom of keeping and re-heating bath water is an invitation to legionnaires disease. I'm sure he'll be shocked to hear about the stagnant pool of water he has installed in my house.
I don't know whether their failed attempt at fixing our problem was a gambit to get us to subscribe to a maintenance contract, or a genuine failure to fix it, but either way I don't think we've even got to the stage of maintenance. We are still dealing with getting a suitable system that has been correctly installed.
It sounds like the manufacturers are also culpable. This system was designed in northern Europen, and I think works very well there. Apparently there have been a lot of problems in Japan with systems leaking in the summer. The diamond-shaped heat exchanger fits in the middle of the unit, with air coming from outside going from bottom right to top left, then the air being sucked out of the house going from top right to bottom left. There's a collector and a drain in the bottom left chamber for the air being expelled during the winter, when it will be precipitating moisture. There is no drain for air coming into the house in the summer. This is not likely to be a problem in summer in Europe, where it is not so hot and not so humid. When it is high in the thirties and close to 100% humidity in a Japanese summer, there is going to be some precipitation on the other side, and no drain for it to drip through. Since hotter air carries so much more water, this could result in a lot more condensate than in the winter.
Another issue is that Japan just seems to have a lot more bugs, germs, particles and general small crap. The average temperature is significantly higher and presumably this just multiplies a lot of stuff.
But the real question is, is anyone really interested?
If they are, then there are immediate and long-term solutions.
Long term, the system should have more rigorous drainage, so that it will handle regular and irregular condensate, both from expelled air in the winter and incoming air in the humid summer. Parts should be easy to clean. Build-up of crap in the heat exchanger itself is inevitable, and it may be that a lower-cost disposable material would be cheaper, long-term.
Short term, we need to get our system level, so that there is no pool of stagnant water in there. Another possibility is to put a collecting pan in there, that would funnel water from the heat exchanger through the drain.
Even more short-term, and probably medium-term, I need to contact the suppliers, the manufacturers, or their agents in Japan, and try to get someone to take this seriously since heat exchange ventilation systems are crucial to low energy building, and it is bad news if they are being driven around by cowboys.
Sunday, 2 February 2014
Maintenance, corrections and adjustments for humidity
Saturday, 18 January 2014
How much water is in the air? A worked example
Here's a practical physics problem. I have a leaking ventilation system with a bowl catching the drips. How often do I have to empty the bowl?
Assume it's 20 degrees inside, with 40% relative humidity, and a little below freezing outside. Assumptions are approximate. All the best ones are. Save the precision for what you know.
A cubic metre of saturated air hold a little under 20 ml of water at 20 degrees C. A little under 5 ml at freezing. The ventilation system is set to shift 150 cubic metres per hour, so that's something like 450 ml of water per hour. The bowl holds 2.9 litres. It's going to fill up in about 6 hours.
Oh no, better go and empty it!
Wednesday, 15 January 2014
Dry air and dripping pipes
Thursday, 17 October 2013
Humidity pump
Another way of looking at humidity is in the pressure of the water vapour suspended in the air. In a wall, there is a temperature gradient between the inside temperature and the outside temperature. In the steady state this is going to be a straight line. If the insulation is glass fibre, air and moisture can pass with some freedom. If hot air from inside is passing all the way outside, as the temperature drops the humidity will rise so at some point the humidity will likely reach 100% and you will get condensation. To stop this, you need vapour barriers that will stop the air inside the house flowing through the wall structure. Then, the air will stop flowing, and in theory at least, you'll get constant humidity throughout the wall, even though the temperature is dropping and there is much less absolute moisture content in the air close to the outside than there is close to the inside.
In the summer, the temperature outside is higher, so you have the opposite situation and the danger of water condensing on the way in, as the temperature drops. The humidity inside the house is higher, so the walls may get too humid at some point.
Wufi software simulates the performance of a wall structure over time, and you can see an example below, although this is not for our house!
Just like insulation slowing down the heat rather than stopping it from escaping, vapour barriers and other kinds of waterproofing do not stop water, they just slow it down. Anyone who has stayed in the rain for long enough in waterproof clothes knows this. It's fine for a while, but eventually the rain will get through. I remember my Dad discovering how waterproof his boots were after a very rainy walk around Haweswater in the English Lake District--water had got into them but it took for ever to get out again. Cheap waterproofs can also be sweat proof, so sooner or later you're going to be wet inside anyway.
Essentially our house has a couple of rain coats on. On the outside is Tyvek sheet is made by Dupont, who also make Goretex rainwear, which is designed to stop precipitation from getting in while allowing perspiration to get out. We need the same thing in a house, so that moisture does not build up within the wall structure, leading to rot. Tyvek stops drops of water from getting through, but will let water vapour pass, so the walls can stay dry.
We used Intello inside the wall structure, which allows very little moisture through in the winter, preventing condensation and rotting walls. In the summer, it opens up and lets moisture through, which allows the walls to dry out.
You can see an interesting effect below of humidity going up with temperature, instead of going down as it usually does. The first chart is the normal situation, where the relative humidity gets lower as the temperature goes up, since the absolute humidity is the same, but the air's capacity for water vapour increases. The lines at the top are humidity, the higher one outside the house, and the lower inside the house. The temperature lines are below.
The next chart shows the humidity and temperature within the wall, when the sun is beating down outside, making the temperature just inside the Tyvek high. This makes the humidity low, and as a result, humidity starts flowing outwards through the wall. We're measuring temperature and humidity in the middle of the wall, so at some point it should be possible to test how the wall performs in real conditions. After almost two years, the humidity seems to be staying in a safe range.
Thursday, 27 June 2013
Humidity makes it feel hotter. Or is it colder?
Something's been bothering me about humidity. When it's more humid it feels hotter, so a humid summer's day will feel a few degrees warmer than if it's dry. This is because we judge temperature by the rate at which our bodies lose heat, and since they lose heat by evaporation, they lose heat more slowly when there is more humidity.
So how come cold damp days feel much colder than cold dry days? Isn't the humidity going to make us lose heat more slowly and make us feel warmer at this temperature too? The answer is clearly no.
It probably has something to do with clothes. I guess what happens on a cold, damp day is that the cold damp air hits our clothes, which are going to be closer to ambient temperature on the outside and closer to body temperature on the inside. The clothes are going to be busy heating up all that air, and because it's humid, that's going to take more energy, so you're going to lose heat. Or something like that.
I'm not sure if that makes any sense, but perhaps higher humidity makes you feel warmer if you're naked.
Taking your clothes off when it's cold and humid may not necessarily be the answer. However, this was a habit of the indigenous peoples of Patagonia, where there are sub-arctic rain forests of high humidity and low temperature. Apparently when the Christians came along, they encouraged them to wear clothes. The result was mass outbreaks of pneumonia and decimation of the population. It's not clear to what extent this was due to the clothes or due to the germs of the Europeans, which were probably responsible for most of the 90% drop in population of the Americas upon the arrival of Columbus.
Neither am I any less confused about the relationship between humidity and apparent temperature when it's cold.
Friday, 7 June 2013
Condensation on the windows
Thursday, 2 May 2013
The right level of humidity
It looks more precise, but the reproduction leaves a bit to be desired. It's a photo of a poster from a presentation, by the look of it, but I can't find the original source online.
There was one here: https://www.educate-sustainability.eu/portal/content/factors-comfort
There's another more sketchy one here in the green garage, Detroit, with the temperatures in Farenheit. I know I'm prejudiced, but I don't trust temperature scales based on the body temperature of sheep, when there is a perfectly good one based on the freezing and boiling points of water. Biology is at least two steps down the fuzziness ladder in the realm of the sciences, and physics should not be borrowing measurements from there.
There's another one here.
During the one-year evaluation, the boss's son from the builder said we should aim to keep it between 40 and 60%, although he didn't have anything more scientific, and for more precision told us we should see how dry our skin and throats feels. I asked where the humidity should be as far as the wood is concerned.
The architect then started talking about wood having 8-10% humidity, so the humidity of the house should be fine.
I researched more about this later, and found that he was actually talking about the moisture content of the wood. This is not the same as the humidity.
The thing they have in common is that both are percentages.
But the percentages are very different. The moisture content of the wood is the amount of the weight of the wood that is water. The relative humidity is the amount of moisture in the air, as a percentage of the maximum moisture that the air can hold.
Obviously there is a relation between the two, since wood is somewhat permeable and moisture can get in and out.
Here are some relationships, extrapolated from woodweb.com.
22% RH = 5% EMC
28% RH = 6% EMC
35% RH = 7% EMC
42% RH = 8% EMC
49% RH = 9% EMC
57% RH = 10% EMC
65% RH = 12% EMC
74% RH = 14% EMC
80% RH = 16% EMC
EMC is the equilibrium moisture content. In other words, the moisture content that you'll end up with if you leave wood in conditions with that relative humidity.
They give a short version too:
RH% EMC%
0 = 0
30 = 6
50 = 9
65 = 12
80 = 16
I can see some kinds of trends in the humidity within the walls, with some differences between the North and the South. Back in July the middle of the north wall was averaging 58%, fluctuating between 51% and 68% at an average temperature of 27 degrees. Over twenty days in the middle of February it was averaging 31%, fluctuating between 23% and 40%, at an average of 11 degrees.
In the South wall, the July humidity was slightly lower with slightly larger fluctuations. In both May and October, the humidity in the North wall was around 10% higher than the south wall. Roughly averaging 50% against 40%.
Monday, 10 December 2012
Steamy breathing
We've now got three new humidifiers in the house, each with a performance of 300 ml/hour, so if they're all steaming away they can put out 900 ml/hour, which should be enough to keep us at 50% relative humidity when it's bone dry outside. It may now be possible to over-humidify the house, so I'm just going back to the question of how much humidity is added to the house by other means. I know we have some plants in the house, but since we're watering them every few days with a single wine bottle, and the house is losing that much water every hour, they are not making a massive contribution.
Apparently 6 litres per minute for a 70kg adult. That's 360 litres per hour.
From this site on humidity and anaesthesia, just in case anyone is still conscious out there, they have figures for water content in mg/l at 20-degree room temperature and 37-degree body temperature: 18 and 44 mg respectively. These figures correspond with the g/kg figures I was talking about in my humidity blog.
If the air going in is at 20 degrees at 50% humidity, holding 9 mg of water per litre, it looks like a standard adult will add around 35 mg/l, a total of 12 grammes of water to the air per hour. Two adults and two children will add around 40 grammes. So this is something like 5% of the humidity we're loosing on a day when it's freezing outside and 20 degrees C inside.
But then the bells of legionnaires disease start ringing again.
Friday, 16 November 2012
Not enough humidity in the winter
The volume of the house, again in the roughest of ballparks, is 500 cubic metres. A kg of air takes up about 0.8 cubic metres, so let's over-compensate for our overestimation of the amount of water that the air can hold, and say that a cubic metre of air can hold 4 grammes of water at freezing, 8 grammes at +10 and 16 grammes at +20. In a house we're not really interested in the weight of air, and the volume is going to be pretty constant.
If we start with 50% humidity at 20 degrees inside the house, that means there are 500 * 0.5 * 16g = 4kg = 4 litres of water in the air. If we imagine it's a steady zero degrees outside, also 50% humidity, and we switch on the ventilation system to shift 120 cubic metres in and out per hour, that's going to bring in 120 * .5 * 4g = 240 grammes per hour, and expel 120 * .5 * 16g = 960 grammes. A net loss of 720 grammes.
The humidity outside is going to make a difference, but even if the air is dripping with mist and it's 100% humid, we're still going to be losing twice as much water as we gain, around half a litre per hour. If it's bone dry, we lose almost a litre. Britain tends to be dryer in the summer and wetter in the winter, while Japan is the opposite, with humid summers and dry winters. In the summer, the opposite effect happens, so if it's 35° C outside, even if there's only 50% humidity when the temperature drops to the 25° C inside temperature, it will be saturated.
To maintain the humidity in the cold winter, then, we need to be emptying something like one wine bottle of water into the air in the house every hour. Of course, there are some sources of humidity within the house, for example bathing, washing clothes and cooking. If we use a tumble dryer, or hang out washing inside, this will help keep the humidity up. As humans respire and perspire, we're giving out water too. The air we breathe out from our moist lungs is saturated and above room temperature. That's why mirrors and spectacles steam up when we breathe on them. House plants can also keep the humidity up as the water we give them evaporates. This is all good, but I'm not really sure how big the effect is.
Burning fossil fuels gives off moisture, as the hydrogen atoms within the hydrocarbons combine with oxygen in the air. Our cookers are electric, so they don't help us.
The other place humidity is going to come from is the building materials. This is not such good news, if the building is drying out.
At the moment we have one small humidifier which gurgles away noisily and empties its 2 litre tank in about six hours, which is not going to keep up with the ventilation system's dehumidifying effect.
One option when we were choosing a ventilation systems was whether they maintain humidity going in and out, or ignore humidity. We chose one that ignores humidity, probably for reasons of hygiene as the moisture that it's passing from the outgoing air to the incoming air could contain bacteria. Legionnaires' disease has been known to thrive when moisture is circulated in a ventilation system. We usually just hear about this from hotels, rather than private houses. This may be because hotels have bigger systems, or maybe because it affects more people and is bigger news. Since this disease kills one in ten healthy people it affects, the stakes are high and caution is warranted.
The US Department of Labor offers some useful tips on designing HVAC systems to avoid legionnaires' disease. Very simply, if a system avoids bodies of water, especially any between 25 and 45° C, and only allows clean air in, it should be OK. Perhaps we could have followed these to make a built-in system to regulate the humidity safely. Getting another humidifier is probably much easier and cheaper though.
More precision (than you probably need or want)
| Temperature | Maximum possible water vapour grammes per kg of air |
|---|---|
| -10° C | 1.79 |
| 0° C | 3.84 |
| 10° C | 7.76 |
| 20° C | 14.95 |
| 30° C | 27.69 |
Sunday, 11 November 2012
Too much humidity in the summer
Some of the thermometers in the house have been dutifully recording humidity for over a year now, but for the first few months I was largely ignoring that, much more interested in the temperature. Humidity is, of course, important for the health of the building and of the people in it. If the humidity is too high, there will be condensation. Condensation provides an ideal habitat for molds and mildews. Dust mites also like humidity, so high humidity means more dust mites, which in turn cause more allergies and asthma for people.
If the humidity is too low, the wood in the building can dry out and shrivel up. This may not have huge structural consequences, but can lead to warped plaster board and cracks in the paint work.
The comfort level for humidity is between 30 and 50%, apparently. Or between 40 and 50% or between 35 and 45% depending on which website you're reading. Our house was usually in that range in the first winter, but over July and August was in the 50 to 70% range.
The human body generates heat at around 100 watts, and has to lose it somehow to avoid overheating. The main method of heat loss is evaporation, and the more humidity is in the air, the less effective this is. This means that if air is very humid, it feels a few degrees hotter because we judge temperature by the amount of heat we lose. If the air is very dry, it can feel cooler, but this can also lead to dry skin and respiratory problems.
Humidity is not presented as an absolute quantity of moisture in the air, but the amount of moisture relative to the maximum the air can hold. As air gets hotter, it can hold more moisture, just as hotter tea can hold more sugar, although technically speaking the humidity is not dissolved in the air as the sugar is in the water. So as the temperature goes up, we can expect the relative humidity to go down, and vice versa, as we can see on this graph of the temperature and humidity inside and outside on a couple of days in the summer. The total amount of moisture in the air, both inside and outside, is not changing very much.








