Monday, 12 September 2011

LED bulbs for torches

In my extensive peregrinations around the Wired Weird World looking for answers to the puzzles that LED lighting present, I came across a website selling LED torch light bulbs for 190 yen apiece. Never wise enough to resist wasting money on a bargain, I put in an order for four of these. Two rated at 3-5 volts and two at 4.5. I've now opened two of them, and one is a little brighter than the other, but they are identical so I'm not sure which one was which.

The immediate use is a series of battery-powered camping lamps that are in that grey area between the store room and the dustbin. LEDs for camping is an obvious choice, especially if you have small children, who are likely to switch the light on as soon as it gets slightly dark, and leave it somewhere until the morning. A conventional bulb will leave the batteries flat in no time. Since we started using LEDs for camping, we found that the batteries were still working when we got out the camping gear the following year. Another advantage of LEDs when camping is that they don't attract insects. 

So, rather than throwing away the old camping lamps, replacing the bulbs with LEDs seemed like a sensible option. This is no doubt a false economy, but there it is. 

We have three old-style lamps, with a handle that turns into a stand and allows the lamp to point in any direction. Two were large and one was a miniature version, that takes double-A batteries. The only batteries I had were double A's, so that was the one to be tested. I think this was a Thursday morning, but work seemed much less important than trying out these new devices.

The bulb fit the torch well enough, and the light came on. I had checked the diameter, and it was an E10. The 10 means 10mm, and I'm not sure what the E means, but I also got some E17s for some small table lamps and clip-on spots, and may get some E27s, which are standard-sized bulbs. They all screw in, which is where things started to screw up.

The problem was the lack of a flange at the top of the metal part of the bulb. The torch was designed for a bulb with no thread, but a flange at the top. This was held into place by a metal ring that screwed onto the plastic bulb holder, and so kept the bulb in place. I decided a slight modification was in order.

If I bent the metal strip that made the connection to the outer terminal, I thought, that could work on the bulb thread, and keep it in place! Just a little bend one way, then another, and it's sure to hold it in place.

It worked a little, or at least it seemed like it would work if I could bend it the right way. So I tried adjusting it a little more, then a little more, and then the metal strip broke. 

The good news was that I now had a small L-shaped strip of metal. I could use this to locate the bulb in the holder, so that the metal ring would now keep it in place and I didn't need to worry about the thread. 

The bad news was that the terminal no longer reached the bulb, and the light wouldn't work.

No problem, I assured myself. I can fix that with a little bit of wire from the base of the terminal to the metal ring that is now holding the bulb in place. I got the finest gauge of wire I could find, and made the connections. It looked great, until I tried to switch it off.

The torch switched on and off by sending the bulb holder, with the bulb in it, up and down. This turned it into a spotlight, then a lamp, as the bulb moved up through the reflector. For my modifications of the bulb fitting, I had pushed the bulb holder up, and taken the batteries out to avoid dazzling and a short circuit. After I'd fixed the wire on, I tried to switch the bulb off. This pushed the bulb down into the torch, where a bit of the wire got caught on something, and the switch snapped.

So now the bulb works perfectly, except that it won't switch on.

I was a bit more successful with the other two lamps. I spent another 190 yen on adapters that you can put AA rechargables into, and turn them into big D-sized batteries. The kids can have one big torch each, leave it on for the whole night, and the only thing they can fight over is the colour. 

Wednesday, 7 September 2011

Changing the world... one seat at a time

There's always a nagging question, in many human endeavours, of whether we really can change the world. My reason for building this house, and going through the constant struggle with architects and builders, to say nothing of the colossal investment of my time and (the bank's) money is not just to get a nice place to live in. I hope that it will help other people get what they want. I hope it will lead to other house builders getting the comfort that twenty-first century technology and materials can provide. The comfort allowed by the science of the nineteenth-century, when the seeds of global warming were being sown. Also, I hope it will lead to a world with an intact ecosystem for my grandchildren, and not just a dull anthroscape.

Anyway, the good news is that we HAVE changed the world. 

It is now possible to get toilet seats delivered from the UK to Japan. Replacement toilet seats dot com ship to Japan!

The closest delivery address used to be Jersey, and that's really only close in the alphabet, not on the planet.

With the delivery, it's still not costing much more than the 9,700 yen they were charging us.

"Oh, you can't use foreign seats," they said. "They're different sizes and don't fit!"

But which foreign? Surely not ALL toilet seats in the other 191 countries in the world?

"Well," I resisted the temptation of saying, "Japanese toilets have been fitting my foreign arse for several years now."
 
The Japanese standard seems to be width: 360, length: 470, gap between bolts: 140 mm.
UK toilet seats seem to be 370 wide and between 400 and 460 long, so there is some variation. Gaps between bolts also vary. Most toilet seats can be adjusted for the gap. Many can also be adjusted for length. So, the UK seat will come out a centimetre wider, and a centimetre shorter. Hopefully it'll fit, though. I know there is some precision work going on in most places around the house, but in the tolerances of toilet seats, a centimetre doesn't sound like much. 

Thursday, 1 September 2011

A complete photo album

The house is by no means finished, but we're not going to get any more shots from the far south west corner, as there's now a house in the way. I just went through the album on Picasa and thinned out the photos from over 70 to 36. Please enjoy the slide show! It starts off with the boiler being lifted in before they put the roof on.




Photos of the outside of the house are easy. You just have to stand far enough back, and that's what it will look like. Taking pictures inside is much more tricky if I want to give an idea of what it looks like.

Monday, 29 August 2011

Lights in the bedroom

For a start, the main purpose of a bedroom is sleeping, so you have to wonder exactly what the light is for. We're going to get some bedside lights, so we can read before going to sleep. These can be fitted on, or beside, the bed. It seems foolish to permanently fit bedside lights as we may realise the bed is not in exactly the right place.

The room has a window very high on the north wall, so it should get plenty of light in the daytime. So the most likely situation in which we will really need lights is if we get up very early in the morning and need to choose which clothes to wear. There are a couple of built in wardrobes along the west wall, probably opposite where the bed will be along the east wall. The door comes in at the south east corner of the room and sliding doors along the north open into the walk-in closet. The a walk-in closet in the back has its own lights anyway, so even in the scenario of getting up really early, we may not need much light. 

The ceiling is diagonal, underneath the solar roof, but there is a horizontal part in the middle where a beam runs east-west, and a couple of ventilation ducts run alongside it. This seems like a good place to fit some lights. There are several options, below. In each
case, I'd like to choose LEDs, although in view of how little it seems this light will be used, I'm not entirely sure. In a very short time, I suspect fluorescents will look rather silly in a low-energy house.

1. A duct rail with spot lights on
2. Universal downlights that can point in different directions
3. A single, variable light in the middle of the ceiling
4. Regular downlights
5. Double LED spotlights
6. An LED strip light, running east west
7. Single LED spotlights

I started off thinking 1. The duct rail seems like a good idea, as you can move the lights back and forth and twist them around to illuminate what needs illuminating. They seem pretty expensive though, at least for LEDs. You have to get the rail, of course--5,000 yen for a 4m Toshiba rail--and any light fitting that is reasonably priced (under 2 or 3,000 yen) has "bulb not included". Maybe I'm being stupid, and I'm probably not being economical, but I have a problem with any fitting that is designed to exchange LEDs, in a country where the life expectancy of LEDs is longer than that of houses. There are, of course, some existing fittings that LED bulbs can be retrofitted into, but three lights is probably going to end up around 20,000 yen. There are some reasonable duct rail fittings for E26 bulbs, for under 2,000 yen, then with a bit of shopping around, it looks like there are LED bulbs to fit in them for 2 or 3,000 yen each for 5 or 6 watts, corresponding to a 50 or 60 watt incandescents. If the house is delayed much longer, the bulbs are likely to become even cheaper.

The architect's first plan had a row of down lights, two with universal joints to the west, to illuminate the wardrobes, and two fixed to the east. When I started looking at prices, I noticed how expensive the universal down lights were. The cheapest fixed downlight I could find with a built in LED was 3,650 yen. This was 5 watts, corresponding to a 40 watt incandescent, with a CRI of 70. For higher wattage and better colour referencing, they get more expensive. The cheapest with a universal joint was 8,620 yen. In terms of design, uniformity seems like a good idea, so if we need the lights on the west side to move around, then having a row of three of the same lights will look least offensive. Not that people are going to be spending much time looking at the ceiling. Three of these will come in over 20,000 yen.

So by the time we've made these allowances, we could just get one of the central ceiling lights that we're putting into the living room and the Japanese room downstairs. These follow the simplicity of a "traditional" Japanese ceiling light, that is stuck to the middle of
the ceiling, usually with a pull-cord dangling from it. They have two or three circular fluorescents, and a mini night light, so if you pull the cord it toggles between being on at full brightness with all the lights lit, to partially on, to just a night light. We have a couple in our house and converted them several years ago to being low-energy by taking out one of the circular fluorescents. Actually, we just didn't replace one of the tubes when it stopped working. It's still perfectly bright enough. Anyway, a year or so ago, I think Sharp brought out an LED ceiling light that looks like one of these ceiling lights, but is filled with
LEDs of different colours. It has no pull cord, instead sporting a remote control which can vary the brightness and the colour. They started retailing around 70,000 yen, and have been followed by other manufactures, and I've recently found a Toshiba light for 20,000 yen. The advantage of these lights is that they are very flexible and can fill the room with the right colour and amount of light for the circumstances. They have remote controls so, although the manufacturers recommend you add a wall switch, you don't really need one and can fit a holder for the remote control wherever you like on the wall. I think this won't look so good on the bedroom ceiling though.

Another option is to just put a row of regular downlights east to west. If they send out a 55 degree beam it should cover all of the floor and most of the wardrobe, except possibly the top right and top left corners. These lights should be bright enough and would look good. This solution would come in a little under 20,000 yen.

It would also be possible to put a double spotlight bracket on the ceiling, pointing to the wardrobes. One of these is available from Odelic for 11,000 yen, but I'm not completely sure it comes with bulbs. There's another from Koizumi for 15,000 yen, also with exchangeable bulbs, I think included. If we put a double spot to the west, then for aesthetic balance we should put another double spot to the east. This solution would also come in a little over 20,000 yen.

Another option is LED strip lighting. This should be an economical option as strip PCBs with LEDs added every few centimetres are cheap, however one problem is the fittings. There are some from Neo blue 1.2 metres long for 13,860 yen. These run on 24 volts DC, so a transformer is necessary. It would be easy to dim them, but I don't think dimming is a high priority for this room. Either we want it light or dark. There are some 100 volt strips from Mini Bee for around 10,000 yen for 90 cm. There's also a 590 mm strip from Noatek for 2,700. Most of these cost around 1000 yen per watt of LED. There's a 420mm strip for 1750 yen that is about half that, but
it is 12V and needs a power supply. All of these are manufactured outside Japan. Another problem with these is how bright they will be. This kind of lighting seems to work very well inside cabinets, for corridor lighting or for ambient lighting, and it will certainly stop the room from being dark. It may not be bright enough to help choosing clothes. As the light comes in strips, it could run along the edge of the horizontal bit of ceiling and would be practically invisible when not on. This kind of lighting fits the lines and spaces of buildings and the manufacturing processes of LEDs, but at the moment it doesn't fit into the imaginations of architects, the mindsets of electricians or into the spaces in the market.

Option 7 is then single bracket spotlights, arranged in a row from west to east. Three would probably be enough, if they are wide-beam. Again we're limited by the range and cost of spotlights, which seem to start at 7 or 8,000 yen with bulbs built in or included.

After the first round, I think we can eliminate 2, 3 and 6. The more I look at it, the better the duct rail of spot lights seems. It will probably come out cheapest, and has the advantage that if it's not bright enough, we can get another couple of fittings to put in there, or replace the bulbs with higher wattage ones, notwithstanding my earlier comments about the irreplaceability of non-replaceable LEDs. There are some 12 watt bulbs for 7,500 yen and 16 watts for 8,200 yen. Those prices will probably halve in the next year.

Low cost and high flexibility. So I'm back at my original idea and it seems like I've been wasting my time prevaricating and writing this. I hope it wasn't a waste of time to read it!

Wednesday, 24 August 2011

More mind-numbing numbers about solar panels

I was thinking of using all the bits of paper we've received somewhere in the house. They could wall paper most of it... Probably two layers in some places.

Of course some of the information has come electronically.

One of the more interesting files has a list of the power ratings for each panel. Although they are nominally rated at 190 Watts each, the test results for each panel all come over 190, and average 195. So while the array is rated at 9.12 kW, it's actually 9.36. All extra kilowatts over their lifetime. The panels are guaranteed for 25 years. More specifically, at 95% for 5 years, 90% for 12 years, 85% for 18 years and 80% for 25 years, so I guess their lifetime will pretty much correspond to the rest of my lifetime. Anything we get out of them (or me) after another quarter century is going to be a bonus. Unless something drastic happens, the panels will still be there producing electricity long after I've stopped consuming it.